• There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Online Research Communities vs Online Focus Groups

Published 06 Dec 2016 | Updated 07 Feb 2022 3 minute read

Online qual
Research communities

Leading the Customer Success team here at Further, I get asked a lot by researchers about Online Focus Groups (OFGs). Sure, they have some benefits - they are quick to set up, quick to execute, they provide instant transcription, so researchers can export transcripts in a moment - but more often than not, researchers can achieve more with their asynchronous cousin, the Online Research Community. Here’s why...

Benefits of online research communities vs online focus groups

Even before the pandemic drove (almost) everything online, Online research communities were fast becoming one of the most popular forms of online qualitative research. That’s because they offer so many benefits. For example:

1. Flexibility

An Online Focus Group is a synchronous activity. All participants gather together and answer questions within the same online setting and timeframe. In contrast, online research communities are asynchronous: there’s no requirement for participants to give their responses at the same time. That means:

  • Whether your participant is an early bird or a night owl, a #GirlBoss, or a stay-at-home-Dad, participants get involved in their own time, when it suits them.  This approach builds and supports engagement because you’re accessing participants at the moments when they want to look at online and mobile content.
  • Participants can engage with the research at their own pace, without being constrained by the time constraints of an online focus group.
  • Participants can respond to questions without being affected by the responses of other people (a potential pitfall in both traditional and online focus groups). This makes it easier for all voices to be heard.

There are benefits for your moderators too. Instead of reacting to every participant's comments within the hour, in real-time, they have more time to analyse responses, probe (in private or within the group), and make a lasting connection that will garner richer responses.

2. Rich, contextual data

In an Online Focus Group, you have to ask participants to remember how they behave and feel during any given activity.

With an online research community, you can ask participants to input data whilst going about their normal daily life. It’s an amazing opportunity to interact with your subjects in “real” time. So, for example, a sportswear company could ask participants to give feedback before, during and after going out to exercise.

This genuine involvement in a research-relevant activity pulls in far more contextual information than you can achieve with a focus group. Participants are reflecting on their actions as they’re happening, so they can share richer and more immediate data.

3. More input from each participant

If you have six people in an online focus group for one hour, you could hope to get – at best - 10 minutes of contributions from each participant. If you have six people in a three-day, online research community, each committed to engaging for 20 minutes a day, that equates to 60 minutes of contribution from each participant.

It’s easy to see which delivers greater value!

Example: Using Online Research Communities to Capture the Social Lives of Consumers

Online research communities can capture any aspect of people’s lives: including those that are rarely spoken about.

On behalf of a well-known skincare brand, we created a community to unearth insight into the (largely) hidden world of male beard grooming. This isn’t a widely-discussed ritual and yet it’s bound up with key emotions and attitudes about contemporary masculinity and identity.

Participants were encouraged to share their thoughts, feeling and behaviours about their facial hair. This all fed into a consumer journey map, visualising the needs, wants, hope and desires of bearded men. The research allowed us to clearly articulate their real-world experience and actions and what motivated their behaviours.

To learn more about the male grooming project, read the case study, or to learn more about how we can work with you to map your customer journeys, head over to our expertise pages. 

The approach surfaced new consumer-centric concepts that challenged the current beard-grooming provision. The client used the outputs to inspire design and innovation thinking, enabling a more human-centred design methodology and rapid prototyping.

How we can help?

At Further, we have been supporting and managing online research communities for over 12 years. This has resulted in a lot of feedback from participants who tell us how fun, engaging and rewarding the experience was for them but don’t take out word for it, here’s what our clients have to say about their experience of working with us and using our platform.

We believe online research communities get you better quality responses, richer contextual insight (and more of it) than online focus groups. Participants take part on their terms. By leveraging native digital behaviours, they are also more likely to share truthful responses in the moment, rather than composed thoughts after the event.

The guide offers commentary and best practices from global industry experts to help you run even engagaging and successful online research communities and projects.

Or get in touch, we'll be happy to share our expertise and if you're interested take you through a demo of our online qual platform, Together™ .

Discover our platform and services


The insight platform for online qual, research communities, digital diaries, ethnography and more.

Services & Support

A range of expert research services and resources to help you deliver your projects with ease, speed and reach.


Human insight with impact; leveraging our academic and industry experts to uncover insight, create impact and make confident decisions.

Conde-Nast (1) (1)

We were amazed at the level of insight we achieved in just a week. Further opened our eyes to new ways of researching and understanding our staff

We helped Conde Nast International define a new global mission and vision statement

van-tay-media-Kab_-4M4I74-unsplash (1)

Further really understood the brief and were extremely proactive. We are now very confident that we’re taking the right products and proposition to market.

We helped this insuretech startup tailor their customer value proposition for the UK market ahead of a planned launch

Keyhouse (1) (1)

Further's expert team pushed us to clarify our assumptions and to think harder about how to communicate the value of our products and services

We helped Keyhouse enter a new market and understand what target users of their case management software needed and how to position their offer

FTH001_Mother_2_children_tablet (1)

Working with Further was a refreshing and eye-opening experience…...the qualityof their output which was excellent.

We helped Unicef generate insights to support the development of a mass market, sustainable fundraising product.

Zwift image (1)
Zwift-logo (1)

Strategically, Further’s insights provided clear and directional answers that will guide us through our next phase of growth

We helped Zwift understand users and non-users needs and wants so they could prioritise their innovation pipeline

Chillys image case study (1)
Chillys-logo (1)

We helped Chilly’s leadership team consider new ways to understand and co-create with their customers’

We helped disruptive pet insurance company Waggel develop customer personas and map out the current and intended customer journey.

What next?

Browse our site, download our resources, request a demo of our platform or speak to one of our experts

Browse our work
Contact Us